Emma West, immigration and the Liberal totalitarian state part 3

Robert Henderson

Emma West appeared at Croydon magistrates court on 3rd January.  She  will stand trial  on  two racially aggravated public order offences, one with intent to cause fear. She will next appear in court  – Croydon Crown Court –  on 17 February 2012.

The  charge with “intent to cause fear “ arises because a passenger, Ena-May Eubanks, claims Miss West  hit her left shoulder  with a closed fist.   This charge comes under section 31A  of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 (http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/37/section/31). It carries a potential sentence on  conviction on indictment of  “ imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years or to a fine, or to both”.

Anyone who has watched the video on YouTube will think the idea that she intended to cause fear when she was a white woman surrounded by hostile ethnic minorities laughable.    The CPS are clearly playing the pc game by hitting her with the most severe charges possible.  (The official line on what is a racially aggravated offence can be found at http://www.cps.gov.uk/news/fact_sheets/racially_aggravated_offences/).

Miss West has yet to plead,  but the fact that she  has opted for a  Crown Court trial (which will mean the case is heard before a jury) rather than a hearing in a magistrates court strongly suggests  she will plead not guilty ( http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2012/jan/03/woman-accused-tram-race-rant).   This is because she  risks a heavier sentence in the Crown Court and it would make little sense to opt for  the case to be heard in the Crown Court if she does  not intend to plead not guilty.  There is of course the danger that she may be intimidated into pleading guilty by the promise of a lighter sentence.

Her bail conditions are  that ” she does not travel on a tram within Croydon and Sutton, lives and sleeps  at her home address and does not comment on the case. ” (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-16394046).

Bearing  in mind that Miss West was remanded in custody against her will for “her own safety”, it does seem rather rum that the same court is insisting she stays in her own house when her address was read out in open court.

The ban on travel on the local tram system could  be pretty penal. She has two small children and the tram system may be the only means she has of taking them with her when she has to leave her house.

Her  blanket gagging so she cannot comment on the case is remarkable.   Engaging in any of the following can  breach the sub judice rules and constitute  contempt of court:

1. obtaining or publishing details of jury deliberations;

2. filming or recording within court buildings;

3. making payments to witnesses;

4. publishing information obtained from confidential court documents;

5. reporting on the defendant’s previous convictions;

6. mounting an organized campaign to influence proceedings;

7. reporting on court proceedings in breach of a court order or reporting restriction;

8. breaching an injunction obtained against another party;

9. anticipating the course of a trial or predicting the outcome; or

10. revealing the identity of child defendants, witnesses or victims or victims of sexual offences. (http://www.out-law.com/page-9742)

Only   4, 6, 7, 8 would seem to have any application in the context of banning her from commenting on the case.  Number 9 might  seem to have relevance,  but by pleading one way or the other the outcome of a case is anticipated. It would be absurd if it applied to a defendant.

Nos  4,6, 7,8 could have been dealt with by banning those specific acts, although it is unlikely she would be in a position to do these things. For example, it is wildly improbable  she could mount an organised campaign to influence proceedings.   It is also true that cases can be discussed while a case is active in the context of a discussion of public affairs, for example, it would be acceptable to discuss Miss West’s case as part of an examination of how the justice system treats black on white offences compared with white on black offences.

What does her  general gagging  tell us?  Simple. The liberal elite are truly terrified that the politically correct house of cards they have built will be blown over if any of the vast resentment and anger at mass immigration and its consequences  within the native British population is allowed into the public fold.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Anglophobia, Immigration, Nationhood, Politics and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

14 Responses to Emma West, immigration and the Liberal totalitarian state part 3

  1. paul kinnane says:

    people could help Emma by going onto web sites in Croydon which allow comments – and give them key words to google search for eg Ena-May Eubanks Emma West
    Also they could go to web sites in Upper Middle class Beaconsfield as it MP Attorney General Dominic Grieve has to approve all racially aggrivated charges , post on say web site of local cricket club -his voters may not be enthusiastic about mass immigration

  2. Antony says:

    There you go again Robert – native ‘British’ population. This is NOTHING to do with ‘Britain’ or being ‘British’. This is an ENGLISH problem, inflicted on ENGLAND by an anti-English, scottish influenced political elite, whose aim is to balkanize ENGLAND in order to prevent ENGLISH men and women acting collectively in their own interests ever again. ‘English’ is NOT a synonym for ‘British’ furthermore. I like your column, and you’re an effective communicator, but failure to employ the correct nomenclature suggests faulty thinking. It’s precisely this sleight of hand that lets politicians refer to immigration as ‘British’ and which, by implying a burden shared more or less equally throughout this island, effectively draws a veil over the damage being visited upon one part of it.

    • david brown says:

      Antony -i agree with your view -the Guardian web site gives a figure of 9.3 million ethnics in the UK .About the population of Sweden not spread amongst us from John O,Groats to Lands End but concentrateted on the main cities of England. Can you post your comment much as it was on my own offbeat web site. Also suggest you post on Telegraph and Guardian.

    • JFen says:

      You’re wrong about it being ‘Scottish elites’, it’s actually a convergence of Zionist and Frankfurt-marxist influence

  3. Pingback: The claustrophobia of diversity | England calling

  4. Pingback: The claustrophobia of diversity « Living In A Madhouse

  5. newell says:

    Anthony your’e right about the English being Ethnically cleansed however now they are using historical and educational methods to prove that England and the English never existed as a sperate people from the Celts.
    I was browsing a book shop in Berlin and came across a book about the origins of England by someone called Akroyd in it he quoted Gildas as saying that the “The “English fled like fire from the “saxons””and later he claims that the English held off the Saxons for several generations in thier own areas .This man is supposed to be a serious author suffice to say i will avoid his work from now on ,although no doubt he will have a promising career probably at the B.B.C..

  6. Julian Lee says:

    Emma West Reverse Speech
    Worth passing around to English patriot friends.

  7. Pingback: Emma West trial delayed for the third time | England calling

  8. Pingback: swissdefenceleague

  9. Pingback: THE EMMA WEST TRIAL REPOSTED « swissdefenceleague

  10. Pingback: The persecution of Emma West continues | England calling

  11. Pingback: The persecution of Emma West continues | Living In A Madhouse

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s