The Scottish Independence Referendum – unanswered questions

Robert Henderson

NB UK2 stands for the UK containing England, Wales and Northern Ireland

The vote on Scottish independence is in 2014. The next UK general election is scheduled for 2015. The date for  Scotland to leave  the Union is 2016.  Assuming Scotland votes for independence these unanswered questions need addressing:

1. When will existing MPs sitting in Scottish seats be expelled from the Commons?  Will they be allowed to continue sitting in the Commons until the 2015 general election?

2. Will Scottish Westminster seats which fall vacant before the Independence referendum be filled in the normal way with a bye-election?

3. What will happen to Scottish Westminster seats which fall vacant after a  vote in 2014 to leave the Union but before the 2016 formal departure date?  Will there be a bye-election to fill the seat until the formal departure or will the seat be left vacant?

4. What will happen to peers who have hereditary Scottish titles or  are Scottish life peers?

Unless they are excluded from the Lords they would continue to have a say in UK2’s politics after Scottish independence.    The cleanest solution would be to insist on peers residing  in England, Wales or Northern Ireland and make any peer wishing to sit in the Lords divest themselves of any formal nationality other than British.  That would mean peers were in a different position to the rest of the population with regard to legal nationality, including MPs, who can at present hold more than one nationality.  The answer would be to make illegal the holding of anything other than British nationality by anyone sitting in the Lords or Commons .

5. What will happen to those holding  British passports who find themselves in an independent Scotland or wish to have Scottish nationality whilst living elsewhere? This would be a good time to deny dual nationality to British citizens generally.

6. What will be the position of Scotland and the rest of the UK (UK2) respectively with regard to the EU?  There is no precedent for an EU member splitting into  separate sovereign states and the component parts of the original EU state being taking back into the EU.  Both logically and legally it is difficult to see how the EU could  allow  either or both of Scotland and UK2  back in without a further Treaty agreed by the other 27 states. Several of those states would require referenda before such a Treaty could be approved.

7. What if Scotland or UK2 were refused admission to the EU or decided they  did not want to join the EU?  If one country was outside the EU it  would have to apply the barriers to trade that the EU states apply generally to those outside the European Economic Area (EEA)

8. What would happen to immigration between UK2 and Scotland? The danger is of  Scotland  allowing large numbers of people to enter Scotland knowing that these people would almost all head straight for England. Whether or not Scotland was a member of the EU, there would have to be strict immigration controls on those coming from outside the EEA and if either Scotland or UK2 was outside the EU, there would be a strong case for imposing border controls.

9.What currency will Scotland use? The position with the Pound Sterling is beautifully simple: Scotland was allowed to use the English currency after they signed the Treaty of Union in 1707, having discarded their Scottish Pound, which was only worth a few English shillings. If they leave the Union they break the Treaty of Union and consequently no longer have any legal right to use the Pound.  It would be a disaster for England if Scotland was allowed to use the Pound because in practice England would be the lender of last resort for Scottish financial institutions through the Bank of England and even without a financial catastrophe Scottish fiscal recklessness could generally weaken the Pound.  Scotland should have to choose between the Euro or a new Scottish currency. If Scotland has to reapply for EU membership she would probably be forced to take the Euro as all new state are obligated to do so.

10. How will the oil and gas revenues be divided? Even if this was left simply to a matter of what is in whose territorial waters  Scotland could get much less than they estimate (around 90%+) if the territorial waters are determined by lines drawn at the angle of the coast at the English/Scottish border. Moreover, a good deal of the oil is around the Scottish islands, who have been making noises about not wishing to be part of an independent Scotland. Shale oil and gas also comes into the picture. Most of the likely UK shale deposits are in England. It would be a grand irony if Scotland cut herself off from a share of the revenues from these by opting for independence.

11. From  what date will Scotland’s proportionate share of the UK national debt be calculated?  It would be significantly lower if calculated at the time of the 2014 referendum rather than the formal date of leaving in 2016.

12. How will Scotland finance the servicing of her proportionate share of the UK national debt?

If she retains the Pound this could be done simply by paying to the British Treasury the sum needed to service it. Scotland would be able to reduce the servicing charge by making payments to the British Treasury to reduce the debt.

If Scotland does not retain the Pound she would either have to join the Euro or establish a new Scottish currency. Either could be a very dodgy proposition. To safeguard UK2’s interests,  Scotland should be forced to raise the money, if she can,  through issuing her own bonds, converting these into a safe currency and then  passing the money to UK2. Alternatively she could buy safe currency and pass that to UK2.

13. Since the Union in 1707, Scotland has taken far more from the Westminster Treasury than she has raised in tax. What payment is Scotland to make to the rest of the UK to repay this subsidy from the rest of the UK (in effect from England)?

14. What will happen to the state holdings in the banks RBS and Lloyds?  At the moment these are both net liabilities not assets because the share value of both means the  £45 billion put into them by the UK taxpayer could not be recouped if the shares were sold.

15. How are the assets of the  UK to be divided between Scotland and UK2?  For the material assets which are physically fixed the only practical way would be for Scotland to retain what is in Scotland and UK2 to retain what is in UK2.  The moveable assets such as military ones could be divided,  but there would be little point in giving Scotland equipment they could not afford to use, for example, the larger surface ships or submarines. The Trident deterrent must be removed to an English base together with any other ships allocated to UK2 which are  currently based in Scotland and warship building retained in Portsmouth.   The only substantial overseas assets would be  the diplomatic operations in embassies and consulates. However, these have been scaled back over the past  thirty years. An agreement would probably  have to be made whereby the UK2 kept the properties and offset some of the Scottish share of the UK national debt against their notional share.

I6. If an independent Scotland cannot or will not maintain armed forces equivalent to those now stationed  in Scotland, what will happen to the men and equipment? Will the British Army absorb them?

17. There are many public sector jobs in Scotland which service the rest of the UK ( How long after the vote for independence will they be removed to the part of the UK which they actually serve?

18. Who will be responsible for paying the pensions of civil servants working in Scotland but servicing another part of the UK?

19. What proportion of the overall UK public  sector pension entitlement at the time of independence will Scotland be responsible for? This pension entitlement will include those paid to the armed forces, British Eurocrats and the diplomatic service.

20. At what date will the accumulated public sector pensions of the UK be calculated? Immediately after the vote for independence, the date of formal independence or what? The later the date the larger the Scottish liability.

21. Will those with Scottish nationality have to have work permits to work in UK2?

22. What will happen to the BBC? At the moment Scotland gets a very good deal because she pays in proportion to her population,  but gets the benefit of the entire BBC output, the vast majority of which is paid for by English TV licence payers. There is no reason why an independent Scotland should continue to do so.  They should form their own public service broadcaster (if that is what they want) and purchase BBC programmes on the same basis as any other foreign country.

The terms on which Scotland could secede from the Union should be agreed before any Scottish vote on independence. Agreement to the terms should be through  a referendum of voters in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. Only if accepted by those voters should the independence question be put to the Scottish electorate.  That question should be Do you wish to have independence on the terms offered by the rest of UK?

This entry was posted in Devolution, Economics, Immigration, Nationhood, Politics and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to The Scottish Independence Referendum – unanswered questions

  1. rubenmbell says:

    Good food for thought, I’m originally English but currently live in Scotland. I think that Scottish independence is something that will at some point happen, unfortunately, for Alex Salmond I believe that this is some form of branding exercise and he would much rather be known in years to come as the man who pushed Scottish Independence, rather than the man who secured the prosperity of the nation.

    You can find my thoughts on the referendum here;

    • E Justice says:

      You are “originally English” rubenmbell so you are not English now? living in Scotland must do strange things to a person.

      • rubenmbell says:

        Turn of phrase I guess, living in Scotland definitely does strange things to you but it’s what happens when you move from country to country every few years!

  2. maverick says:

    Obviously all SCOTTISH MP’s should be sent packing after independence ,generally i have been in favour of the Union,but after devolution it cannot remain the as it is now.
    IT must be independence or Westminister rules all corners off the U.K.,.The gerrymandered status quo engineered by Labour for it’s own political ends ,retaining power in Scotland and using Scottish seats to keep a hold on England is now a busted flush.
    The tried and tested iMarxist idea of regional separtism and Multi racial nations is ripping paticularily ENGLAND apart.
    In England the mass immigration pioneered by Labour is proving to be an enormous own goal as more extreme racial and religous based parties push aside Labour in inner city England,Thier agenda of “human , ,gay,womans rights ect. will be brushed aside by Muslim fanatics,

  3. DICK R says:

    The mass immigration was not an own goal, but a deliberate act of malfeasance enacted by a largely scottish labour government.

    • maverick says:

      You may be right Dick,you can never really know peoples inner motivations ,but thier actions point to a well hidden racial hatred

      • Alex says:

        So you are saying that the ‘largely scottish labour government” (7 out of a cabinet of 24 in 1997) was secretly filling up the UK with immigrants as a ploy to tear apart the social fabric of the country because of a deep seated racial hatred of the English? Did this include the home secretaries of the period – Jack Straw, David Blunkett and Charles Clarke, all Englishmen but possibly brainwashed by the evil, bitter, racist Scots to be foot-soldiers in their cruel plan to undermine your fine green and pleasant land!! Was John Reid’s tough immigration measures (including a new border agency and more powers) just a cunning rouse, to divert the unsuspecting pure-hearted English folk into not realising he was actually a hateful racist Scot.

        And Maverick, you agree with this terrible ploy, yes? You agree with Dick how hateful and bitter we Scots must have been to have orchestrated such an evil scheme. To have buried our racism so deep inside ourselves we are not even aware its there. Its a terrible thing.

  4. There can be no referendum on the future of the ‘United’ Kingdom until the people of England have a Parliament to protect our long term interests: the British certainly will not do so.

  5. david brown says:

    sorry this is off topic – on is another first class article by the author of this blog. A profile on Mandela. You can also find the story of the man arrested by the UK PC police for putting
    on a fairly general web site a couple of non racial Mandela jokes. This appears to have been at the instigation of a local liberal council member. I can not be 100% sure that there is it more to this story but does not seem so.Does this man have a claim for wrongful arrest for how can there be a law in England prohibiting making sick or otherwise jokes about another countries political figures. If Obama, George Bush or Angela Merkel died would it be a crime in England to post a bad taste joke?

    Why was it OK to have a pop song in the UK Charts mocking the demise of Margret Thatcher .I do not agree with those peoples sentiments but thought it was ok because we are a free country..
    I have e-mailed the liberal asking him if this is the case. Wonder if he will reply

  6. David Oldfield says:

    It’s unthinkable that Scottish MPs continue to sit in Westminster at next may’s election. We could be saddled with a labour government thanks to their votes.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s